chore: add pi prompt shortcuts
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Run technical debt audit with file-cited findings
|
||||
argument-hint: "[scope]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Use pi-crew with the `flights-web` team and the `tech-debt-audit` workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
Scope:
|
||||
|
||||
$@
|
||||
|
||||
Audit architecture, consistency, type contracts, test debt, dependency/config debt, performance, observability, security hygiene, and documentation drift. Prefer file:line-cited findings and a ranked remediation plan. Do not edit production code.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Show Pi crew and usage metrics
|
||||
argument-hint: "[metric-filter]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Show current Pi and pi-crew metrics for this project.
|
||||
|
||||
Use `/team-metrics` for crew metrics, applying this filter if provided:
|
||||
|
||||
$@
|
||||
|
||||
Also summarize how to inspect token/cost/session reports with `npx @ccusage/pi@latest session`, and clearly separate inference time, crew task duration, and pause-inclusive conversation gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Compare legacy Angular and React implementation parity
|
||||
argument-hint: "<feature>"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Use pi-crew with the `flights-web` team and the `angular-react-parity` workflow for this feature:
|
||||
|
||||
$@
|
||||
|
||||
Treat `ClientApp/` as the Angular reference and `src/` as the React implementation. Produce or update the business-logic spec, parity matrix, and verification report under `docs/parity/`. Use existing compare scripts and Playwright MCP where useful. Do not edit production code unless I explicitly ask for an implementation follow-up.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Run focused crew review of the current branch or diff
|
||||
argument-hint: "[scope]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Use pi-crew with the `flights-web` team and the `review-only` workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
Scope:
|
||||
|
||||
$@
|
||||
|
||||
Review the current branch or diff for correctness, regressions, test gaps, unnecessary complexity, docs drift, and GitOps readiness. Do not edit files unless a clearly safe documentation or config fix is required and you report it explicitly.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Run the Flights Web spec-driven implementation crew
|
||||
argument-hint: "<goal>"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Use pi-crew with the `flights-web` team and the `spec-driven-implementation` workflow for this goal:
|
||||
|
||||
$@
|
||||
|
||||
Prefer a worktree for non-trivial implementation. Run spec analysis, planning, critic review, TDD/test planning, implementation, unit/e2e verification, code review, docs handoff, and GitOps handoff according to the project crew config.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Start a TDD-focused implementation pass
|
||||
argument-hint: "<goal>"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Use the `tdd-tester`, `unit-tester`, and implementation roles from the `flights-web` crew for this goal:
|
||||
|
||||
$@
|
||||
|
||||
Start by identifying the behavior contract and the smallest failing test. Then implement the minimal change, run focused tests, and ask critic/reviewer roles to check the result before GitOps.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user